Same as... The Changeling is the same plot as Star Trek 1 (film) John5:55pm Mon 26 Mar
Not actually bad... ...but has plot holes large enough to fly a fleet of Romulan Warbirds through. Shilliam Watner8:00am Mon 20 Oct
Epic failure Zachary Quinto as young Spock is compelling but everything works against him and the entire film crashes and burns a hundred times. Footnote8:30pm Tue 29 Apr
where no man has gorn B4 its a larf, and worth a watch. clever casting - but remember folks its fiction...hahahaha! seinfeld7:06pm Mon 4 Jun
Lensflare Trek Living proof sad trekkies will watch any old piece of trash. Absolutely dire rubbish and a complete waste of money. Trek is Trash7:40pm Sun 18 Dec
2nd best Star Trek after Khan This is a fantastic film it came out the same year as Avatar and is a much better film imo ,ignore the people trying to tell you its rubbish their talking nonsense i mean just look at the viewer rating
The Great andPowerful Turtle7:33pm Sat 8 Oct
Repeats, Repeats, Repeats, Repeats ... Not again!!!
Who are there schedulers?
A deaf, dumb and blind man man could do better. Warlock6:18pm Sat 8 Oct
what an amasing film 10/10 for this one. tail lift7:27pm Mon 3 Oct
AWFUL Had been looking forward to this, but having seen it i can honestly say it is one of the worst films i have ever seen, just bad in every department. ABSOLUTELY DREADFUL. TOPWAK (THE VOICE OF REASON)7:37am Mon 3 Oct
good presentation worth a watch. stars5:22pm Thu 29 Sep
Star trek XI It's essentially the battle seequence from revenge of the sith stretched out for 100 mins(they sy so on the dvd) with 20 mins of random events thrown in as a stroyline. The plot(what there is of it): Romulus gets destroyed, the bad guy from nemesis gets sent back in time to before the original series era and now has the most powerful ship in the galaxy. Does he try to conquer? NO. Does he try to save Romulus(his home planet)? NO. Instead he sort of waits around for 20 odd yrs then destroys Vulcan.
The new Enterprise : For a start it seems to have shrunk and now consists of only 3 parts. The bridge, tiny and looks like a leftover from a washing machine advert. The shuttlebay, an old hangar or studio with a set cheaper than the one from star wars. The engine room, here they didn't even try. It's a concrete bunker full of pipes, with no engineers or even an engine.
The new crew : seemed quite good from what i could tell(they weren't there much), I especially liked Karl Urban as bones but his total screen time was about 60 seconds.
Plot holes you can drive a starship through, ridiculous random events(sorry leutenant this random cadet is now captain), cheap sets, a highly engineer and advanced starship thas was previously made by skilled engineers with unknow equipment is now made by sweaty men with welding gear and I could easily go on.
All about the cgi and an insult to your intelligence 0/10
Why?4:36pm Thu 29 Sep
Star trek original Fantastic!!!!!!!!!! A great series. Dodgy studios and effects, but good for the time. The story lines seem better than today!! Katter10:58pm Fri 19 Mar
Entertaining but drivel Not a shade on the original. Young Kirk is a born again moron whilst the plot is unchallenging, disappointing and somewhat predictable. Could have been so much more. 2 out of 10 for trying. Kerrji9:14pm Wed 30 Dec
"Propaganda" propaganda propaganda propaganda propaganda propaganda propaganda Microsoft Paperclip3:50pm Sat 5 Dec
Alien commander Mark Lenard, not Mark Leland. NickyK9:45pm Fri 4 Dec
Thumbs up Aww Yeah Reece Hinton12:13pm Fri 3 Apr
fantastic kirky at his best malaga3:08pm Thu 5 Feb
Read all TVGuide users comments on Star Trek. Scroll to the bottom to submit your own comment.